Imagine the World's Most Interesting Apple Gentleman, and an unknown apple.
Some unidentified apples. |
He (the gent) inclines his head politely. Squints and sniffs at the apple before taking a bite, measuring its blush, parsing its lenticels.
He swirls the bits in his mouth. Pronounces, "Of the Snow family, I think."
Spits, bites again, chews. Swallows. "Yes. McIntosh branch. Not that that helps us much." The next bite is pensive. "But something else. Cidery."
Another bite. "Well balanced. Sprightly."
Nods. Smiles."Jonamac."
Views the apple again, and studies the color of the revealed flesh. Holds it up to the light. "From the Nashoba Valley."
Consults some inner catalog. Cuts into the calyx and studies the stamen. "On a hillside facing northwest." Brilliant.
And alas, not me. For all my enthusiasm, I claim no particular talent for apple identification.
It's not even possible unless the apple is one of the hundreds I've tasted, versus the thousands I have not. Assuming it is a named cultivar at all, and not a chance seedling.
But it is fun to try, and around the American Thanksgiving Steve Barnhart sent me 2 varieties, 3 each, 6 in all, from his home orchard in upstate Michigan. Big handsome specimens, well packed.
He thinks the yellow apple might be Northwest Greening, and generously writes,
Enjoy some of my personal favorites and don't feel obligated to write up a long response.
Oh come on Steve, not even try? I take your generosity as permission to fail, but not to duck the challenge. Of which the red apple turns out to be the greater puzzle.
Thanks to the generosity of Lisa Boes, another reader, I happen to have a Northwest Greening for comparison. I've been hanging on to it to see how it ages. (Well, by the way.)
One of Steve's Northwest Greenings. |
True, Steve's taste of pear, which Lisa's did not, and not conspicuously of melon, which Lisa's did. Chalk it up to different harvest times and/or storage and handling.
So let's assume the Awesome Apple Gent agrees with me, and shift the white heat of our attention to the mystery red.
Though not nearly so imposing as the Greenings, these apples are still plenty big. They are conical and tapered and moderately ribbed, and a little lopsided.
Red's streaky blush runs to a striking deep purple-tinged red over yellow, with a dull matte finish. A small number of large light lenticels provide decoration, but closer inspection shows many small low-contrast cells as well.
The apple has a rich cidery smell, and the peel is waxy enough to repel water. The calyx is closed, but not tightly.
I started out with the idea that this could be a Cameo, with extra time on the tree accounting for the unusually dark red color. But the flavors are too interesting for that.
Inside I found fine-grained yellow flesh, a little past prime but still rewarding. The flesh is shot with streaks of red. One apple was slightly savory, another more cidery, all with a chewy peel. Mostly sweet, but a nice lively acid tang, a little spice, and a whisper of honey.
The tell for me was the savory note, and also the color of the peel and the low-gloss finish. Surely this is the Stayman, also known as the Stayman Winesap. Possibly one of its well-colored sports. On the very outside, perhaps a true Winesap.
Stayman can be quite good eating in December, though I think these may have been harvested on the late side. Stayman is known as a southern variety, but the Michigan extension service lists Stayman as a Michgan apple.
I'm not quite as confident that Mr. Apple Gent would agree with me on this one, but it is my final word.
Steve Barhart photo |
Thank you Steve, and Lisa, and everyone, for your generosity and indulgence.
Hmm. Not sure what the red apple is, but I don't think it's a Stayman. That apple (as it grows in my little Northern California orchard, at least) tends to be big, with lots of bloom and russet, and very crisp and juicy, but rather more brisk and tart than sweet. A late example would lose the crispness but still wouldn't be very sweet by modern apple standards. They also tend to be noticeably conical in shape. I can't quite tell how true that is of yours.
ReplyDeleteIt sure looks familiar, though, especially in the lower photo;
still, I can't quite place it, either.
Jerry, it's not at all sweet "by modern standards" (which I do not share). There is sweetness however.
DeleteAs for conical, it's what I said. It was the tapered profile, mostly that made me think Cameo, before I had a taste.
Maybe it isn't Stayman, but maybe Stayman just grows differently where you live. Still I'd be interested to know your theory if it comes to you.
A tip o the apple to you, btw.
Perhaps it is indeed one of the darker sports, as you suggested. My own skills at apple identification are still rudimentary, and reds can be particularly challenging.
ReplyDeletelooks familiar
ReplyDeleteThank you, Adam, for a most enjoyable write-up. You are a true gentleman.
ReplyDeleteSteve, thank you for your generosity sharing these apples. It was fun playing.
Delete