Four years after I first had this elegant hobo of an apple, I have the opportunity to take a second bite.
I might learn something new, or at least have a very nice (two-star) snack.
Outside
Lenticel dots would be hard to see but for specks of russet therein. A few of these pores in the small blush are inflected with specks of saturated crimson.
The apples are rock hard.
Inside
Is that weird? Not, it is not, it works well with the other tastes. But it is unusual.
The Clochard has a good breaking crunch and its density makes it a little chewy too. The flavors are distinctive, if subtle, and harmonious. All in all a very satisfying apple.
I saved my second sample until today (November 8) to see how well it would age. The older apple is merely OK, with softer texture and melded flavors.
It might fare better in high-tech storage, but Clochard is not a keeper.
See my original review for more on history, name, etc.

So when did Reinette Clochard get promoted from two stars to three? I was just trying to find some post where you decided on three stars for this apple, but your 2017 stars post (posted in February 2018) only gives Reinette Clochard two stars. And the parenthetical link in paragraph 2 of this review mentions a (two-star) snack. I don't want to be a pain in the neck here--I was just trying to decide Reinette Clochard's place in my grafting schedule and was looking for some reasoning for why it got three stars.
ReplyDeleteNever mind. I see you did the promotion in the February 2022 post, revising based on this (2021) review.
ReplyDeleteThat change was the most recent I have made to my 3-star roster. This post is a report on the samples that changed my opinion that way.
Delete